Welcome back Lee - glad to hear your views again.
Thanks Paul! Just got back from vacation so it's taken me a little while to focus and get back into the flow of things.
I think that you and I have a different interpretation of Satan. Man's ego which gets in the way of doing good things for others to me is Satan. In that sense of definition then you are correct. If you interpret Satan as an outside entity, that has the ability to tempt and afflict you regardless of your free will, then I have to disagree.
I agree with you on man's ego being influenced by satan.
Isaiah 14:13-14 is a good parallel scripture representing ego. Satan is all about ego....notice Satan says
I WILL five times in these two verses alone. It's all about him. I also believe that Satan is also an outside entity as well. He isn't called the prince of the power of the air or the prince of this world for nothing. I believe Satan definitely has the ability to tempt and afflict the believer as well as the unbelievers.
The believer - Satan wants believers to doubt God in every way. He wants believers to doubt God's person, His truthfulness, His faithfulness to His promises, His love, His grace, etc. Satan seeks to prevent believers from sharing the gospel and from encouraging each other. Though we are not told how he does these things, Paul tells us that Satan did interfere with his plans to visit
Thessalonica. Satan is actively seeking to tempt believers with the world system he has established. The world denies the truth of Scripture, the world denies that the Word of God is truth. Satan wants believers to doubt the authenticity of God's Word. Satan moves believers to lie in order to improve their material wealth. He deceives believers into justifying unfaithfulness and promiscuity. He tempts believers into becoming prideful of their own righteousness.
The unbeliever - Satan's influence in the world order is seen in the way that world systems operate. Satan will find ways to take away the Word from those who do not cherish it in their hearts. In addition to man's natural blinders, Satan blinds men so they can't understand the
gospel. The blinding work of Satan is only overcome by God's work, by God's sovereign plan
through which the Holy Spirit convicts the elect and brings them to repentance. We could say that
every genuine profession of faith is a miracle, it is God acting supernaturally in the midst of men.
Satan promotes the denial of sin and wrong views of salvation. He nourishes the mind set that we
should lead self-sufficient life styles. The idea that we deserve more, that we deserve to live better is a satanic idea. The world has embraced such thinking and the pursuit of riches is even seen as noble.
But as you said, if Jesus died for everyone's sins, my conflict is why is number 2 even part of the discussion. Church doctrine and preachers alike - some excluded of course- will get on the pulpit to chastise the congregation about being a sinner. Why?
I think number 2 has to be part of the discussion because our sin nature is supposed to bring us closer to Christ and not away from Him. I can't tell you why some preachers chastise the congregation's about being sinner's. Maybe that's why church attendance is declining because the preachers are chastising rather than showing the congregation love.
The story of Job was before Jesus, so while it is a great story about inner conflicts in humans, it would not apply after the crucifixion.
I know it was before Jesus,but it still applies today. As the story goes, Satan challenges God by stating that Job will denounce God if afflicted. God gives permission to Satan to afflict Job to test Job's faith. Of course, Job doesn't denounce God. God still allows these trials and tribulations in our lives to test our faith and make our faith stronger.
So, what would you advise Santosh about how to control his thoughts to overcome this dilemma?
I don't necessarily think sexual thoughts are a bad thing. Sex is part of human nature and I think God understands that. Now, there is alot of gray area in the "thought" part. If Santosh has sexual thoughts about he and his wife/girlfriend I don't see anything wrong with that. If Santosh has sexual thoughts about he and his wife and his wife's girlfriend then that's a problem. I would recommend the same thing Bruce said.